Simulators and log based solutions both offer value to the WoW community. After two weeks a lamp turns on over the code writer head and a new ideia comes: 'if i can capture my damage, why not capture everybody damage? Or whatever ones you like to watch best. Honestly, anyone who has a brain wouldn't bring a Survival hunter to anything because they provide nothing outside of being a Melee dps to the raid. Do you know how to use the ability of your hero to give damage per second at max? I wonder if you guys really don't mind. Needless to say that every single class of heroes has an ability to deal damage.
It sure feels good if your personal performance gets better but that's it. You will not find a prepared answer for the question which one is the best. Rankings are updated for patch 8. I can't justify playing the spec because it just isn't fun in it's current form. Diese stammen aus dem Antorus Raid, aus den Schwierigkeitsgraden normal, heroisch und mythisch.
On the Alliance side, we have six races: one neutral race, and three allied races, in all — ten races: Human, Dwarf, Night Elf, Gnome, Draenei, Worgen, Pandaren, Dark Iron Dwarf, Lightforged Draenei and Void Elf. Mit dem Release der Erweiterung und den daraufhin nachfolgenden Wochen wird es noch viele Anpassungen und Änderungen geben. This means you need to do higher keys. He made this running joke to make people laugh. If you expect hard packs and bosses this is the best choice. We are continuously looking for new profiles, both at the normal and heroic levels.
I have been gone from the game over a year just coming back for about the past 3 weeks and trying to get a feel for the game! Also keep in mind that especially with Mythic + and the new focus on utility, pure numbers is not a great metric to judge specs by anymore. In addition, inefficiencies talents, glyphs, gear, gems, enchants may be found in the supplied profiles. While simulators allow us to get a feel for how a spec performs all of the time through averaging out thousands of fight results, it is important to note that simulators are generally weak when modeling specific fights in a raid tier, and additionally they rely on data that is as good as the theorycrafting community is able to produce. Fire mages will get hit with blastermaster nerfs. This does not look very attractive, but in the total amount of damage, this 1% will be useful. Scroll up and realized I made virtually the same post four weeks ago. That's why method brought one for mythic gul'dan, right? Do let us know in the comment section below! Of course that doesn't mean that I am always right and that I always make the right decision.
Note: we are not here to choose your class for you or tell you what is the best. With every new expansion, Blizzard introduces a number of changes to certain gameplay mechanics, including modifications to damage dealing classes. You copy your character tell raidbots what gear you want compared and it tells you what will be better on average for the situation you specified. Like a WoW Human race, he is great for PvE and PvP and his look is also cool. There are several ways to handle mobs depending on pack size, which mob is infested, and group composition. I guess I am a bit competitive but not as much, not to the point where I would be investing my time into simulations instead of actually playing the game.
For example, after the update 8. The group composition, weekly affixes, the item level of the group, the keystone level, and the experience and comfort level of the group are just several of the factors that will influence how you approach each dungeon. Do and can people even enjoy the game anymore if there's this extremely growing emphasis on the external features such as the simulations? Until we get into the raid and all tuning is done, there is no way to say what class will do what dps. It is a buzzkill for me. The goal of this simulator is to close the accuracy gap while maintaining a performance level high enough to calculate relative stat weights to aid gear selection.
That is absolutely a subjective opinion and there is no answer what race or what class is the best. I mind people spewing simcraft results for different specs like they actually say something about the relative viability of these specs though, because that is mostly noise and very little signal. Welcome to , a subreddit about the video game World of Warcraft! Now the issue is the details! Those classes are the highest in most cases so far but be ready for changes when raids start to hit the realms. After a few minutes the addon jsut turned itself off. We won't know what's doing great for M+, Warmode, Arena, Raiding, Island Expiditions, Warfronts, or Battle Pets until people have been doing them for at least a month.
It might get lucky and get some specs right, but if you check logs when people get the gear used in sims versus those early sims, its 90% wrong. It's not a final revision cause it concerns the 8. I'm not saying they're useless, but it's basically pointless to draw conclussions from single target sims right now. I want to be a melee hunter, but what Survival is right now is way too much effort. Raid log sites offer a perspective on how some of top players are performing with each spec.
It's better that the simcraft rankings don't get posted about while the simcraft profiles are still terrible, and while people still haven't seen how they perform in a practical environment. We will not be seeing output tuning until the release candidate builds, and even then, it will probably be well into the first raid season and we will still be seeing tuning. It is a buzzkill for me. These rankings can be helpful to understand how specs are faring in the current raid tier and often reveal unexpected synergies between specific specs and boss encounters. If you or your pet is dead , and you respawn an other one, this pet will receive a new name and wont show up at the final report. Especially, since the differences between some of the top classes are marginal. There are any number of reasons why in-game results will differ from simulated or log based results.